Home Speeches Information Kits About Werriwa Useful Links About Chris
Contact Chris

Electorate Office

Level 1

2 Oxford Road

Ingleburn NSW 2565

Ph: (02) 9829 7477

Fax: (02) 9829 7499


Mailing Address

PO Box 191, Ingleburn

NSW 1890


Email Address
chris.hayes.mp@aph.gov.au


HANSARD EXTRACT
Adjournment: Welfare to Work
31 October 2005

Mr HAYES (Werriwa) (9.00 p.m.)—I take the opportunity to make some comments on the recent statements by the Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations when he finally came clean about the extent of this government’s agenda on the ABC Television Insiders program a week ago. I refer in particular to the following comments:

We don’t make any excuse for this. We believe that the best form of welfare that a person can have is to have a job.

He went on to say:

Getting a foot in the door in a labour market is much more important and useful for that person than any dependants he or she might have.

I must admit that I was pretty shocked at this frank admission by the minister. It became pretty clear early on on that Sunday morning that this government is not about providing training and support for those moving from welfare to work. It became clear that there is no intention to provide the support services required, such as affordable child care, for those making the efforts to move from welfare to work. It was abundantly clear that this government’s idea of welfare reform is to make sure that you are forced to take a job no matter what the wages and conditions are. This might sound attractive to some people at the moment, but the attitude will soon catch up with the rest of the work force. It may not be immediately obvious to many, but the problem with supporting such an approach is that it sets a new low benchmark for employment practices within business.

As people are forced onto AWAs undercutting established award rates of pay and conditions, what chance does a new employee have of negotiating better terms and conditions under such an arrangement? However, the world according to this government is pretty clear. As the minister said:

The greatest bargaining power people have got today is a shortage in the workforce.

Of course this is true for people who are in positions where there is a demand for their skills. Sadly, a work force shortage does not of itself create a demand for just any labour, and I am sure the minister would be aware that the work force is not homogeneous. It is the fact that labour is not homogeneous and that labour is not perfectly substitutable that blows a gaping hole in this government’s plan to shift people currently receiving welfare payments onto any job no matter what the arrangements are.

My electorate has a relatively high proportion of people who receive either disability support or parenting payments—approximately 11 per cent—and they fear this government’s agenda. They know that they will be worse off once the combined impact of the industrial relations and welfare changes are felt. These people have almost no bargaining power. The current skills shortage and associated demand has not helped them find work so far, and the introduction of a system under which they are forced to take anything that is offered to them is certainly not going to put them in a position through which they can get ahead. These are among Australia’s most vulnerable people and they essentially will have no real protection from exploitation. They will be presented with no choice: either they take what is offered or they lose their income support.

When you start to consider the operation of these policies, it is little wonder that the member for Macarthur recently removed a large sign advertising the location of his office in Campbelltown. Clearly he is afraid that people will find out where his office is and ask him to defend the government’s position on industrial relations and welfare reform.

I make no apologies for standing up for the rights of employees who want to protect their working conditions and entitlements as well as for those who deserve to be treated with dignity as they try to enter the work force. Encouraging people back to work needs to be about more than simply slashing wages and forcing the unemployed to accept a job no matter how bad the offer is. The attitude of this government is pretty clear: beggars cannot be choosers.

 

Return to Speeches Menu.

 
  Useful Links
 
 

          Home